Charles Schumer

DemocratNYSenator

Score based on 18 evidence items

Compare with another senator →
78%62% conf

Overall Score

P1P2P3P4P582%76%67%66%100%

Principle Profile

OECD Principle Alignment

Inclusive Growth, Sustainable Development & Well-being

82%(79% confidence)

Based on 6 items: 1 vote, 5 sponsorships

Human-Centered Values & Fairness

76%(76% confidence)

Based on 5 items: 1 vote, 4 sponsorships

Transparency & Explainability

67%(55% confidence)

Based on 3 items: 3 sponsorships

Robustness, Security & Safety

66%(56% confidence)

Based on 3 items: 3 sponsorships

Accountability

100%(44% confidence)

Based on 1 item: 1 sponsorship

How This Score Was Calculated

1

Evidence Collection

We collect floor votes, bill sponsorships, co-sponsorships, committee statements, floor speeches, and press releases from public congressional records.

2

AI Classification

Each evidence item is filtered by AI relevance keywords, then classified by Claude AI for relevance to OECD principles. Bills are classified for direction. Statements have structured claims extracted.

3

Deterministic Scoring

Scores are computed using transparent math. Each evidence type has a weight (votes: 1.0, sponsorships: 0.9, statements: 0.4-0.6). Temporal decay reduces older evidence.

Evidence Type Weights

Floor Vote1.0
Bill Sponsorship0.9
Bill Co-sponsorship0.7
Committee Statement0.6
Floor Speech0.5
Press Release0.4
Social Media0.2

Evidence Trail

Every score is traceable to specific evidence items below.

Bill Co-sponsorshipMay 14, 2025P1P2P3
View source
Bill Co-sponsorshipNov 13, 2024P1P2P3P4P5
View source
Bill Co-sponsorshipNov 13, 2024P1P2P4
View source
Bill Co-sponsorshipJul 30, 2024P1P2P3
View source
Bill Co-sponsorshipJun 12, 2024P1P4

<p><strong>Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2024 or the DEFIANCE Act of 2024</strong></p><p>This bill establishes a civil cause of action for individuals who are the subject of nonconsensual digital forgeries (commonly known as deepfakes) depicting intimate activity or nudity.</p><p>Under the bill, <em>digital forgery</em> is any intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual created through the use of software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means that is indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual.</p><p>Specifically, an identifiable individual who is the subject of a digital forgery may bring a civil action against any person who knowingly produces, distributes, solicits, or possesses with the intent to distribute a digital forgery without the individual's consent.</p><p>Current law provides civil remedies, including damages and injunctive relief,&nbsp;for the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. This bill makes all relief available for the new cause of action for nonconsensual digital forgeries&nbsp;and expands the relief available for both causes of action. For example, an identifiable individual may recover profits of the defendant that are attributable to the conduct at issue in&nbsp;the claim as part of&nbsp;actual damages.</p><p>The bill also establishes a 10-year statute of limitations, but tolls the running of the statute of limitations until the individual learns about the violation or the individual turns 18, whichever occurs later. This applies to both current law related to nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images and the new cause of action for nonconsensual digital forgeries.</p>

View source
Floor VoteJul 1, 2001P1P2

Vote: YEA on Blackburn Amdt. No. 2814; To strike the section relating to support for artificial intelligence. - On the Amendment <measure>S.Amdt. 2814</measure>

View source